Akron, Inc., owns all outstanding stock of Toledo Corporation. Amortization expense of $15,000 per year for patented technology resulted from the original acquisition. For 2011, the companies had the following account balances:
Akron Toledo
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,100,000 $600,000
Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500,000 400,000
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000 220,000
Investment income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not given –0–
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80,000 30,000
Intra-entity sales of $320,000 occurred during 2010 and again in 2011. This merchandise cost $240,000 each year. Of the total transfers, $70,000 was still held on December 31, 2010, with $50,000 unsold on December 31, 2011.
a. For consolidation purposes, does the direction of the transfers (upstream or downstream) affect the balances to be reported here?
b. Prepare a consolidated income statement for the year ending December 31, 2011.
Students succeed in their courses by connecting and communicating with an expert until they receive help on their questions
Consult our trusted tutors.