Why is randomized block design preferred over completely randomized design
For the theory section, show your work and do not round off your middle work.
Keep your final answer to four (4) decimal places, where relevant.
1.Why is randomized block design preferred over completely randomized design?
2.You want to compare the abilities of four portfolio managers, A, B, C and D. One way to do so is to randomly allocate 40 stocks, ten to each of the portfolio managers. Each manager would then predict the value of the stocks in six months. You record their predicted values. After six months, you see what the values of the stocks are in reality, and determine the error in prediction.
a.Discuss the problems with using a completely randomized design for this experiment.
b.Explain how you could employ a randomized block design.
3.A food scientist is interested in comparing three recipes for banana bread. Four loaves of each recipe are to be baked in an oven that can bake three loaves at one time. As there may be variation in baking condition from one period to the other, a randomized block design was employed. The data are given below:
Recipe
ABC
Baking Period 1514944
(Minutes) 2616255
3565963
4636262
a.Write an appropriate statistical model for this experimental situation.
b.Run an analysis of variance to compare the three recipes. Use = 0.05. Summarize your results in an AOV table.
c.Compute the relative efficiency of the randomized block design and the completely randomized design.
4.The data below were obtained for a randomized block design involving three treatments and five blocks:
SSBlock = 50SSTreatment = 60SSError = 20.
Set up an AOV table and test for any significant differences.
5.Complete the assignments of treatments so that the design shown below is a Latin square design.
Column
ACBED
RowBAC
ECB
EAC
A
Note: Copy the table onto your answer sheet, and write in the missing treatments in a different-coloured ink.
6.Write a short explanation of Latin square designs. Include an example of a 4 × 4 LSD. What are the advantages and disadvantages of LSD?
7.An experimenter used a 5 × 5 Latin square design for his study The results are shown below.
Row12345Total
1A20D35B27C21E23126
2D21C16E16A23B32108
3B20E10A18D30C25103
4C20B30D24E16A31121
5E23A25C19B22D36125
Total104 116 104 112 147583
TreatmentABCDE
Totals117131101146 88
Means23.426.220.229.217.6
a.If total sum of squares is 971.44, summarize your results in an AOV table.
b.Is there significant evidence that the treatment means are not equal?
c.Calculate the relative efficiency of the LSD to a CRD.
8.An experiment was conducted to compare four different laundry detergents and four different washing times. The response variable was a measure of whiteness of pre-soiled clothes washed by each of the 16 treatment combinations. Each treatment combination was replicated three times, a total of 48 washings. The F ratios of for the main effects and interaction are shown below.
EffectF-ratio
Detergent2.23
Time 3.65
Det × Time 3.16
Give the range of p-values within which the p-value for each of these F values falls. For each one, state the appropriate numerator and denominator degree of freedom. Comment on the result.
Hint
Statistics"A randomized block design enables the experimenter divide subjects into subgroups known as blocks, whereby variability within blocks is lesser than variability between blocks. This design minimizes potential confounding and variability inside treatment conditions, which produces better treatment effects’ estimates. This is in fact the distinguishing factor from a completely randomized d...
"A randomized block design enables the experimenter divide subjects into subgroups known as blocks, whereby variability within blocks is lesser than variability between blocks. This design minimizes potential confounding and variability inside treatment conditions, which produces better treatment effects’ estimates. This is in fact the distinguishing factor from a completely randomized design."